Message sent to r.s.v.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New rules proposal...
- Subject: Re: New rules proposal...
- From: Todd <email@example.com>
- Date: 21 Dec 1998 10:42:58 -0600
- Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
- Organization: Not likely
- References: <exK$Bz8K#GA.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: email@example.com
- Xref: nathan.enteract.com sent-to-rsv:174
Sir Lancealot <71774.2351@CompuServe.COM> writes:
> Do you like the new rules that are proposed for rally scoring in
> each game and I think it was 25 points to win in the first 4 games
> and 15 if it goes to the fifth. Someone correct me if I got it
Yes. Plus no cap on any of the games.
> I have mixed opinions about this. I think the games will be quite
> fast and furious. But at the same time sideouts seem to make the
> game have an interesting strategy and different type of momentum
> shifts. I think rally scoring could either make some games go
> really really fast or it could have the opposite effect where some
> games might go into the 20 points and be very tough. It will be
> interesting to see what happens though.
I'm not sure I've decided on this yet. Last weekend, I worked a
juniors tournament using this new format, both as scorer and referee.
From the refereeing side, it didn't feel like the new format affected
individual game length very much. Best 3/5 for tournament play is too
much per match, however.
On the scoring end...wow. I think I quintupled my experience scoring
rally games by noon. Rally scoring with juniors teams who have more
than 12 folks on their roster and seem to double-substitute every
other sideout...will surely make us all faster scorekeepers! :-)
Todd H. firstname.lastname@example.org
USAV Regional Referee, Great Lakes Region, Palatine, IL
Todd's Volleyball Referee Page http://www.io.com/~tdh/vball/
"So you're a Ref and an engineer? Oh that explains it...."
Search this archive! |
Back to Todd's Ref Page |
Main Index |